|
|
mod list.png (4,167 bytes) |
|
|
This is the first time I have seen someone saying the damage is too high, iirc. Anyway, I tested the damage from 1 block away (by going to survival mode without wearing armor and using the health_boost effect to see how much damage I took without killing me), explosion radius (destroying a square of slime block) and explosion results on stone. Here are the results: --- Damage TNT: 22 hearts Industrial TNT: 60 hearts Mining laser: 1 block: 168 hearts 2 block: 132 hearts 3 block: 96 hearts 4 block: 72 hearts full set iron armor 5 block: 36 hearts 31.5 hearts 6 block: 24 hearts 21 hearts 7 block: 24 hearts 21 hearts 8 block: 12 hearts 9 block: no damage --- Explosion Radius (on slime) TNT: 4 blocks, random on the edge Industrial TNT: 2 blocks Mining laser: 4 blocks, with a ring 1 block wide --- Explosion result on stone TNT: irregular shape, different every time Industrial TNT: irregular shape, same every time, took out 34 blocks Mining laser: regular shape, same every time, took out 37 blocks --- So... The results clearly show that it is deadly when being too close to the explosion even with good armor. The damage of the laser is somewhat too high comparatively and obviously unbalanced when using it to finish a wither in 2 sec. The explosion damage should be set to a lower value in close range or add a config option for it. The explosion damage on blocks is quite balanced. setup_stone.png (222,526 bytes) setup_TNT.png (122,534 bytes) stone_I-TNT.png (152,601 bytes) stone_laser.png (135,801 bytes) stone_laser2.png (177,273 bytes) stone_TNT.png (131,391 bytes) |
|
|
more screenshots These screenshots were too large for uploading so I had to reduce the resolution. Redstone block represents where the TNT were placed on top of. slime_I-TNT.png (153,705 bytes) slime_laser.png (143,773 bytes) slime_TNT.png (142,525 bytes) |
|
|
Forgot to mention that the damage test was done by shooting the laser at a bedrock block. The distance in screenshot is 6 blocks, where the player stands on the right most bedrock. |
|
|
Correction: The distance in the screenshot above is 7 blocks, not 6. I just realized that I counted the numbers wrong. |
|
|
The damage is specifically specified to be more than iTNT in the code, as well as the actual block damage to be a tad weaker. 168 hearts is quite the impact though, might be worth going back to see if it has varied between Minecraft versions that dramatically. |
|
|
Did further testing with a range of 1 block. It seems that the damage is different when hitting different sides of a block despite the same range. Results: 1.7.10: 132 hearts 1.8.9: 144 hearts 1.9.4: 132 hearts 1.10.2: 156 hearts 1.11.2: 156 hearts |
|
|
Strange how it has drifted around when the code is effectively unchanged between the versions. I was thinking maybe the armour protection values changing might have influenced it but that wouldn't explain doing more damage without any. |
- Anonymous
